Deportations and Stansted 15 Sentencing

Two very important events were due to happen today. The British government was due charter a flight to Jamaica with up to 50 deportees on board and the sentencing of the Stansted 15 was to take place.

The charter plane did take off with 35 people on board. There were a couple of people who managed to avoid deportation through legal processes. The Stansted 15 were not jailed, they were given suspended sentences and community service.

The Home Office just destroyed more families as it deported another 35 people to Jamaica

6 February 2019

Excerpt from Source: The Canary

On 6 February, the Home Office deported around 35 people to Jamaica. This came on the same day that the Stansted 15 were sentenced for their role in trying to prevent this brutal practice that destroys lives and families. No matter what home secretary Sajid Javid may say, the Windrush crisisis far from over. The UK’s ‘hostile environment‘ is getting worse.

End Deportations

In May 2018, Javid admitted that at least 63 “members of the Windrush generation could have been wrongfully removed or deported from the UK since 2002”. So on 5 February 2019, Labour’s David Lammy asked Javid to rule out the possibility of further mistakes for the men due to be deported. He also asked:

Once enslaved, then colonised, and now repatriated… Why is it that in this country, black lives mean less?

Javid defended the deportations claiming all had “been convicted of a serious crime”. He also claimed none were UK citizens or members of the Windrush generation.

This stood in stark contrast to other reports: (see tweets in source article)

Later, it emerged that six people were granted leave to stay. But there was no hope for around 35 other people. A Titan Airways charter flight left at 8.16am.

“Until there is justice”

As Satbir Singh, chief executive of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said:

It’s inappropriate for the government to resume mass deportations, particularly to the Caribbean, before the Windrush Lessons Learned review has even concluded.

Labour MPs have also continued to place pressure on Javid and the Home Office over resuming deportations before resolving the abuse of the Windrush generation. As Lammy said, it’s a “national scandal”; and Dawn Butler also stated that “it’s a disgrace and it’s a stain on our country”.

In total, 57 Labour MPs also tried to stop this deportation flight. Most importantly, we should never forget how vulnerable the hostile environment makes too many people feel.

Solidarity and support

There are growing moves to place pressure on Titan Airways. In a savage twist of irony, the deportations took place on the same day of the Stansted 15 sentencing. They answered a “call for help” and stopped another Titan Airways deportation flight. And yet, as The Canary reported, they faced terrorism charges. Lammy also made this link clear.

The UK’s hostile environment wrecks families and destroys lives. We know that the government made mistakes with at least six people on this flight. So how many more innocent people may be on that plane? No matter what defence Javid gives, it’s a sickening reflection of a twisted government.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Adrian Pingstone

Read full article with tweets here.


Below are articles published in The Voice last week in the run-up to the events as well as articles reporting the outcomes of both events.

Challenging the brutal deportation system is a must

An alleged charter flight to Jamaica is scheduled for next week alongside the sentencing of the Stanstead 15. We must acknowledge the implications for charter flights and the hostile environment, writes Alexandra Wanjiku Kelbert

Written by Alexandra Wanjiku Kelbert 02/02/2019
Source: The Voice Website
CHALLENGE: Stansted 15 convictions have been described as a ‘crushing blow for human rights in UK’

In March 2017, 15 people made their way to a remote part of Stansted airport, where deportation charter flights have been known to take off in the middle of the night. 

The 15 were part of a wider network of people, and were acting on knowledge that the flight leaving that night would be deporting people to Ghana and Nigeria. 

Detained Voices, a group of immigration detainees and supporters had been publishing testimonies of some of those due to be on that flight. 

The detainees included victims of trafficking, people with ongoing cases, a man leaving behind a pregnant partner and a woman whose former husband had publicly announced his plans to kill her if she ever set foot back in Nigeria. Those now known as the Stansted 15 read some of those testimonies on their way to the airport.

Once there, they chained themselves around the front wheel of the plane and erected a brightly-coloured tripod by the plane’s wing, staying on the tarmac for ten hours, successfully preventing it from taking off. Following the action, 11 people were able to stay in the country, some of their stories finally allowed some time in the  spotlight. 

Crucially, this was the first time a deportation flight had been grounded in the UK by people taking action against the immigration system.

Charter deportations flights are the government practice of chartering entire flights to deport large numbers of people to specific countries. The flights don’t contain other passengers and take off late at night from undisclosed locations, sometimes military bases, hiding these deportations from public view.

There is substantial evidence that people being deported experience violence and abuse on these secret flights, where they are forced to travel handcuffed and tied with waist restraint belts. In 2017, Diane Abbott described charter flights as “a brutal way of responding to the current immigration panic.” Investigations by Corporate Watch revealed that the government selects people for deportation by perceived nationality so that it can fill flights, including people with ongoing legal claims. 

The controversial ‘deport first, appeal later’ policy was been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, only 4 months after the action but there are many other ways the government deports people with ongoing claims.

Following the action, all 15 activists were convicted under anti-terrorism laws, the first time these laws were used against peaceful protestors, and found guilty in Chelmsford crown court in November 2018 following a trial which lasted 10 weeks. This constitutes a serious assault on democracy and our right to protest.

While only 15 people were sitting accused in the dock, many of us knew that a whole racist immigration system was on trial too. By conducting the trial in the way that they did, the courts sided with a system that is brutal and inhumane.

Throughout the ordeal of the trial, the End Deportations campaign has been growing, finding friends and allies, and working closely with other groups such as the All African Women’s group, the Chelmsford Quakers, Schools ABC and BARAC UK. 

Importantly, the campaign has been steadfast in making sure that the spotlight remained focused on the brutal immigration regime, often using their own experiences of the criminal justice system to draw attention to the appalling conditions experienced by the thousands of people currently filling up immigration detention centres up and down the country who can be held without time limit.

While the Stansted 15 have been found guilty, there is still hope that their convictions will be overturned. The wind is turning for this brutal immigration regime. The Windrush scandal revealed deep public opposition for the hostile environment and the brutal treatment of so many of our families, friends and neighbours. 

Groups such as detained Voices and Soas Detainee Support have been alerted of another charter flight due to take off any time between today and the 15th of February to Jamaica. 

This would be the first charter flight to head to Jamaica since the beginning of the Windrush scandal. Already groups are coming together to lobby politicians to try and stop the flight from taking off and meetings have been organised up and down the country for people who want to know what they can do to prevent immigration raids and deportations from taking place. 

On Wednesday, the Stansted 15 will be sentenced. It is likely that some of them will be looking at custodial time. Whatever happens on Wednesday, a week of action against the government’s brutal immigration regime has been planned for the 11-15th February and many are getting ready to protest against the imminent charter flight to Jamaica. 

When a country imprisons some people for peaceful protest, snatches others from their homes in dawn raids, incarcerates them without time limit and forces them onto planes in the middle of the night, due to take them to places where their lives might be at risk, something is very seriously wrong. Thankfully, more and more of us are getting involved in challenging this brutal, inhumane system. Together, we can end the hostile environment for good.

Deportations ‘Slap In The Face’ For Jamaican Community In UK

REMOVALS: A deportation flight to Jamaica is understood to be scheduled for Wednesday, February 6

CAMPAIGNERS HAVE held a protest outside the Jamaican High Commission in London today in response to the mass deportations, which they say are a “slap in the face” for the Jamaican community in the UK.

Movement for Justice, the campaign group behind today’s action, are demanding that the Jamaican government cuts ties with the UK government when it comes to the deportation charter flights that they say are racist and unjust.

At the protest, those at risk of deportation spoke out about their experiences and campaigners led chants of “charter flights, no way, Jamaican community, here to stay”.

One protester said that armed police attended the peaceful protest, an intervention she described as “disgusting and disrespectful”.

Movement for Justice is in touch with 16 detainees who face removal from the UK to Jamaica via charter flight. Around 50 people are set to be removed on the flight.

Read full article on The Voice website.

Deportations Of Six Jamaicans Halted

DEPORTATIONS: Campaigners have revealed that several Jamaican detainees have had their removal from the UK halted

AT LEAST six British residents who were set to be deported from the UK to Jamaica on a charter flight today have had their removals halted.

Around 50 people are believed to be scheduled to be removed from the UK to Jamaica today. The timing of the flight has not been confirmed.

DEVASTATING DECISIONS

Several MPs have called on the government to halt the deportations.

Janet Daby, the Labour MP for Lewisham East, wrote a letter to the home secretary along with 57 other MPs requesting the government brings an immediate halt to the removals.

“We have little faith in the Home Office that has made devastating decisions on the lives of the Windrush Generation and that has not only fairly considered the cases of those on this flight. 

“Additionally, it is outrageous that this is happening while the Windrush Generation are awaiting decisions on their resident/citizen status and who are living in debt and just about surviving while having not seen a penny of compensation or hardship money,” the letter reads.

Read full article here.

Stansted 15 Sentencing: Activists Avoid Jail

SENTENCING: Some of the Stansted 15 outside Chelmsford Crown Court in Essex earlier today

NONE OF the Stansted 15 will be jailed over their protest which halted the departure of a deportation flight in March 2017, a court has ruled.

The group of activists who trespassed into Stansted airport and chained themselves together to stop an immigration removal flight from taking off in March 2017 were found guilty under the 1900 Aviation and Maritime Security Act on terror-related charges in December.

The plane had been scheduled to deport 60 people to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone.

The campaigners who were sentenced Chelmsford Crown Court this afternoon have been handed suspended sentences and community service sentences.

Edward Thaker and Alistair Tamlit both received nine month sentences, suspended for 18 months and were ordered to do 250 hours of unpaid work, Melanie Stickland was handed a nine month sentence, suspended for 18 months and ordered to do 100 hours of unpaid work, and May Mackeith was given a community order for 12 months and 20 days rehabilitation activity requirement, Essex Live reported.

SOLIDARITY: Supporters of the Stansted 15 protesting outside Chelmsford Crown Court in Essex ahead of the group’s sentencing

Outside the court, protestors gathered to show their support and express their anger at the government’s treatment of the activists and immigration detainees.

As a result of the group’s actions, 11 people have been able to appeal their removal from the UK and are still in the UK, Dexter Dias QC, the lead counsel for the group has said.

Kate Allen, Amnesty International UK’s director, said: “The decision not to jail these brave human rights defenders is a relief, but not enough. They should never have faced this very serious terrorism-related charge in the first place.

Read full article here

Heartbreaking tales told as Windrush compensation consultation roadshow comes to Willesden

A father-of-three left homeless after working for 37 years, the teen who could not apply for a college place and a former caretaker who risked his life on the streets after being denied benefits.

Source: Kilburn Times website by Nathalie Raffray

PUBLISHED:11 September 2018 | UPDATED:12 September 2018

Dawn Butler speaking at a Windrush compensation consultation meeting in Willesden

Dawn Butler speaking at a Windrush compensation consultation meeting in Willesden
Martin Forde QC and Wendy Williams chaired a Windrush compensation consultation meeting
Martin Forde QC and Wendy Williams chaired a Windrush compensation consultation meeting 

These are just some of the devastating stories heard at the Lewinson Centre in High Road, Willesden, last Thursday as families gathered to tell their Windrush generation experiences.

People came from across London to hear more about a “complex” compensation scheme currently being researched to compensate those devastated by the hostile immigration policies which affected families who arrived from the 1940s to ‘70s.

The compensation scheme and “lessons learned review” was announced by the Home Secretary Sajid Javid MP in July, with the consultation into the scheme set to end on October 11.

Wendy Williams, an independent adviser for the review chaired the meeting with lawyer Martin Forde QC, who is overseeing the scheme’s design calling it “fiendishly complicated.”

Windrush's Bevis Smith whose life spiralled down despite legal right to remain in UK
Windrush’s Bevis Smith whose life spiralled down despite legal right to remain in UK

“How do you compensate someone who’s been deported?” he said.

George Polion came to the UK from St Lucia in 1968, aged 15, and took up his first job in a shoe factory. 

For the next 37 years he worked, paying national insurance and raising his three children. Five years ago he lost his passport. He found it impossible to persuade officials he was British and soon found himself homeless. 

“I can’t work, I can’t open a bank account, I can’t get any housing. I’m living in a charity hostel,” he said. “I got a letter saying I can take my pension but I’m waiting for the passport people to tell me what’s happening. Without a bank account the money can’t go through. I am confused.”

Cllr Robert Johnson, born in Jamaica
Cllr Robert Johnson, born in Jamaica

He added: “I only lost my passport, I didn’t come here illegally. I want them to give me my status so I can get on with my life.” 

Fitzroy, who did not want to give his full name, arrived in 1980 from Antigua which hadn’t yet gained independence from Britain. For the last 10 years he has been without benefits, a home, a job and rough sleeping. 

Unable to hold back tears, he said: “Ten years ago I lost my job as a residential caretaker. I went to the Home Office and told them I need a letter so I can claim benefit or look for a job. 

“They wrote back to me and they said they had no record of me coming into this country, but I came through Heathrow. 

“I know my mother had a passport like every English person. She worked for British Rail getting her pension and I made sure I took the details, date of birth and I phoned them up and I give them the details and they said they had no records of her aswell.”

He added: “I could get no benefit, no housing, I could get nothing. One night I nearly died. I was sleeping in an electric cupboard in Camden, I woke up because I could hear a noise, the crackling of fire, and there was smoke. If I was a heavy sleeper I would not be here.”

Jamaican Bevis Smith, 62, and living in a hostel, said: “The government owes me a lot of money for what I’ve been through.” He finally received citizenship papers two weeks ago, despite entering the country in 1972 with “indefinite leave to remain.”

Dawn Butler, MP for Brent Central, explained more needed to be done: “Part of the reason people are not reporting to the Home Office is because of a lack of trust,” she said. “We need in the interim to have a hardship fund while the compensation scheme is being ironed out because there are people struggling now. People could just apply which can be offset against compensation later on.”

In a bid to highlight how the younger generation have been affected, Charlotte Bigby, 22, revealed her shock when she tried to get a passport at 16 and her application was denied. Her birth certificate confirmed she was born in the UK, but it made no difference. She said: “My mum was born in 1960 and came here in 1969 from Jamaica and never left. I had to save up £890 to get British citizenship, the Home Office said I was stateless. I couldn’t go to college, I couldn’t go to uni.” 

Mr Forde said there was still no clear definition of who precisely fell into the Windrush classification, and whether the compensation scheme could apply to the children and grandchildren of Commonwealth citizens who were living in the UK before 1973 and who themselves had experienced immigration-related difficulties. 

Ms Williams urged people to respond to the consultation and review, concluding: “It’s my job to reach the conclusions but I can’t do it without help. It’s important for everyone’s experience to be right at the centre of the review.”

Northwick Park’s Cllr Robert Thompson, “one of the fortunate ones” who got citizenship while working for the government invited people to a Windrush debate at the Civic Centre on Monday.

Note: The public Consultation closed on 18 November 2018. Get information by visiting gov.uk/ windrush.

Black activists demand public inquiry into Windrush scandal

Source: Morning Star Website article

Monday, December 17, 2018

ANTI-RACISM activists launched a petition today calling on the Prime Minister to hold a public inquiry into the Windrush scandal.

The move by Black Activists Rising Against Cuts (Barac) echoes a call made by the PCS union, which represents Home Office workers, at its annual delegate conference.

Barac wants a credible independent panel to determine the extent to which the scandal was driven by racism.

The group says an inquiry should also probe the full effect of the Home Office’s persecution of Commonwealth citizens on its victims’ job losses, homelessness, denial of services and health conditions.

The petition is launched amid mounting pressure on the Home Office from MPs. The Commons public accounts committee heard evidence from the department’s top civil servant Sir Philip Rutnam yesterday.

A cross-party panel of MPs quizzed the permanent secretary about whether the government was “doing enough to identify people affected and resolve their issues.”

The Home Office has published new figures showing it had spent more than £6 million its response to the Windrush scandal by the end of October with 175 “full-time equivalent” staff assigned to the initiatives. The department has also funded flights from Jamaica to London for three individuals who faced “urgent and exceptional” circumstances.

On top of the £6 million, about £4m in fees has been waived following the introduction of the Windrush scheme, which allows eligible applicants to obtain status free of charge.

Commonwealth citizens who arrived before 1973 were automatically granted indefinite leave to remain, but many were not issued with any documents confirming their status.

Home Office has failed to establish the full scale of the Windrush scandal, new report finds

Source: Morning Star Website

by Ceren Sagir , Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Jamaican immigrants being welcomed by RAF officials from the Colonial Office after the ex-troopship HMT Empire Windrush landed them at Tilbury in June 1948

THE HOME OFFICE failed to act on repeated warning signs of Windrush failings and has yet to establish the full scale of the scandal, according to a major new report.

Whitehall’s spending watchdog, the National Audit Office (NAO), found the department was aware of “credible information” about possible issues as long as four years ago.

Impact assessments about “hostile environment” measures did not give sufficient consideration to the risk of unfair consequences, the NAO report published today finds.

Some Home Office processes contributed to the risk of wrongful detentions and removals, it concluded.

Labour’s shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said the damning report amounts to a catalogue of government failures, adding that it was quite unacceptable that the department’s practices continue to deepen the crisis.

“Ministers’ repeated assurances that they are on top of this scandal are clearly worthless,” she said. “They need to finally take charge of this shambles, start treating all the Windrush generation fairly and legally, and end the hostile environment.

“Otherwise, this scandal will only continue and more injustices and scandals will inevitably follow.”

A public outcry erupted earlier this year after it emerged long-term British residents were denied access to services, held in detention or removed despite living legally in the country for decades.

The NAO said: “It is our view that there were warning signs from enough different sources, over a long enough period, to collectively indicate a potential problem that merited further investigation.”

It found the Home Office has not yet established the full extent of the problems affecting people of the Windrush generation.

An official review of 11,800 cases of Caribbean Commonwealth individuals identified 164 people who were removed or detained and might have been resident in Britain before 1973.

The department has apologised to 18 people in whose cases it considers it is most likely to have acted wrongfully, but there are no plans to review about 160,000 files relating to non-Caribbean Commonwealth nationals.

The report also revealed at least 25 people may have been incorrectly sanctioned under hostile environment policies, such has having a driving licence revoked.

A spokesman for the department said: “We have worked hard to raise awareness of the support on offer across a wide range of communities.”

An independent “lessons learned” review has been set up and details of a compensation scheme for those affected will be outlined in the new year, he added.

Related Articles:

National Audit Office (NAO) – Handling of the Windrush Situation (contains links to the NAO report)

Click image to watch video

The Home Office failed to fulfil its duty of care to members of the Windrush generation, which led to serious consequences for the people affected. Watch our video about how this happened and what the Home Office is doing now.

Transcript of video

The Windrush victims who have lost jobs, homes and loved ones

‘It’s inhumane’: the Windrush victims who have lost jobs, homes and loved ones

Main image: Windrush victims. Composite: The Guardian

The problems have arisen as a result of the government’s “hostile environment policy”, which requires employers, NHS staff, landlords and other bodies to demand evidence of people’s citizenship or immigration status.

Some of the Windrush-generation children, often travelling on their parents’ passports, were not formally naturalised and, as adults, never applied for passports. The Home Office destroyed their landing cards, making it almost impossible for many people, including those below, to prove they had the right to be in the UK, and having a serious impact on their lives.

Kenneth Williams, 58

‘It’s inhumane’

Photograph: Victor De Jesus for the Guardian

Williams arrived in Britain in 1969 on his sibling’s passport. In 2015 the council he had been working for via an agency refused him direct employment without a passport. He was suspended on full pay but then told to leave. He had a mortgage and could not access benefits owing to his status, so had to rely on family and friends. He was finally given a card confirming he had indefinite leave to remain in August 2017.

Junior Green, 61

‘I feel betrayed’

Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

Having lived in the UK since he was five months old, Green visited his dying mother in Jamaica last year but was refused readmission. He was eventually granted a temporary visa but the delay in getting this meant he missed his mother’s funeral back in the UK. His employer kept his job open but, he says, his mother’s death and the surrounding turmoil meant he was too stressed and depressed to resume work.

Judy Griffith, 63

‘I’ve paid taxes here all my life’

Photograph: Alecsandra Dragoi for the Guardian

Griffith joined her parents in the UK in 1963. After 52 years, a jobcentre employee told her she was an “illegal immigrant” and, because her passport with evidence of leave to remain had been stolen, she was unable to work or travel. Griffith could not visit her sick mother in Barbados in 2016, or attend the funeral. And without work she has got into significant arrears on her flat in London, and narrowly escaped eviction. She recently received papers confirming she has indefinite leave to remain.

Jeffrey Miller, 61

‘It is always at the back of your mind’

Photograph: Teri Pengilley for the Guardian

Miller came from Grenada in 1966, aged nine, on his brother’s passport. He was aware he needed to naturalise formally but the process is expensive and he was worried he did not have all the documents required. He decided instead to avoid all contact with the state, but Theresa May’s apology this week, and her promise that no one would be deported has given him the courage to try to resolve his situation.

Briggs Levi Maynard, 89

‘I was numb … I felt cold’

Photograph: Christian Sinibaldi for the Guardian

Maynard arrived in the UK in late 1957 and after a lifetime working, retired on a state pension in 1993. He had travelled on his Barbadian passport many times without problems but in 2017, at Bridgetown airport, he was told he could not return to the UK because he had neither residency nor records of his status. The temporary solution was to buy a return ticket to Barbados. Now he is trying to apply for citizenship; something he never thought would be necessary.

Winston Jones, 62

‘I thought I would die’

Jones (not his real name) arrived in London in 1972, aged 16. More than 40 years later, he was admitted to hospital with a brain aneurysm, where staff told him he may have to cover the £5,000 bill. While there, he lost his home because of his “illegal” residency status and he was ineligible for a bed in a state-funded homeless hostel so he was discharged to the streets. Eventually a bed was found for him, and he spent years trying to prove his residency, until in January 2018 the Home Office confirmed he had indefinite leave to remain.

Dexter Bristol, 57

‘He died being denied an immigration status which was rightfully his’

Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

Bristol moved from Grenada to the UK in 1968, aged eight, to join his mother who was working as an NHS nurse, and he spent the rest of his life in the UK. He was sacked from his cleaning job last year because he had no passport, was denied benefits and became depressed. Bristol died while still trying to prove he was in the country legally.

Glenda Caesar, 57

‘I felt lost’

Caesar has spent decades worrying she might be deported, despite living in the UK since she was six months old. When her mother died Caesar tried to go to the Caribbean to bring her mother’s body back but was told she could not apply for a British passport. The Home Office has since granted her indefinite leave to remain.

Paulette Wilson, 61

‘I felt like I didn’t exist’

Paulette Wilson Photograph: Fabio De Paola for the Guardian

Wilson, a former cook at the House of Commons, arrived in the UK in 1968, aged 10. She never applied for a British passport and has no papers proving her right to remain. Last October, she was sent to the Yarl’s Wood immigration removal centre for a week, then taken to Heathrow for deportation to Jamaica. A last-minute intervention from her MP and a charity prevented her removal, and Guardian publicity resulted in her receiving a biometric card.

Anthony Bryan, 60

‘There has still been no apology’

Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

Bryan has spent three weeks in immigration removal centres over the past two years. He lost his job when Capita told him he had no right to be in the UK, and that it could be fined £10,000 if it continued to employ him. Last November, police and immigration officials arrived early at his home with a battering ram; a plane ticket was booked to take him to Jamaica, the country he left when he was eight and to which he has never returned. Officials recently acknowledged he was in the UK legally.

Renford McIntyre, 64

‘I’ve worked hard all my life’

Photograph: David Sillitoe for the Guardian

Having arrived in 1968, aged 14, McIntyre had worked in the UK for 48 years but is now sleeping in an industrial unit in Dudley. In 2014 a request for updated paperwork from his employers revealed he did not have documents showing he had a right to be in the UK. He was sacked and the local council told him he was not eligible for benefits.

Leighton Joseph Robinson, 58

‘I lost my house’

Photograph: Andrew Fox for the Guardian

Having gone to Jamaica for his 50th birthday – his first visit since arriving in Britain aged six – Robinson was told at the airport he could not return on his Jamaican passport. He lived in bedsits and hostels for 21 months, until a solicitor resolved the case. On his return in 2011, however, he was told he owed £4,500 for unpaid rent and council tax. Taken to court and evicted, Robinson has been sofa-surfing since.

Michael Braithwaite, 66

‘I’m glad my story opened up the dysfunctionality of the Home Office’

Photograph: Alicia Canter for the Guardian

Braithwaite arrived with his family from Barbados in 1961, aged eight. He lost his job as a special needs teaching assistant after the primary school where he had worked for more than 15 years deemed him an “illegal immigrant”. After a public outcry, the Home Office expedited documents confirming his right to be in the UK.

Hubert Howard, 61

‘They messed up my life’

Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian

Howard arrived in the UK, aged three, with his mother and has never lived anywhere else. His problems began when he wanted to urgently visit her back in Jamaica when she became ill, but without the relevant paperwork, his mother died without him seeing her. Labelled an “illegal immigrant”, he then lost his long-term job with the Peabody Trust.

Albert Thompson, 63

‘It’s grossly unfair’

Photograph: Jill Mead for the Guardian

Thompson (not his real name) arrived from Jamaica as a teenager in 1973, to join his mother. After 44 years working as a mechanic he was denied cancer treatment when he could not show proof that he was in the UK legally. Despite Theresa May having said he would “be receiving the treatment he needs”, Thompson remains uncertain about whether he will get the necessary radiotherapy.

Sarah O’Connor, 57

‘They made me feel like I’m not British’

Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

Having moved from Jamaica 51 years ago, aged six, the benefits agency challenged O’Connor’s immigration status last summer after she lost her job in the computer shop where she had worked for 16 years. Several potential new employers withdrew offers upon realising she had no passport. She had to sell her car and was facing bankruptcy in March. After her story was publicised last month, the Home Office promised to waive her fees for a biometric card application.

Elwaldo Romeo, 63

‘It scares the living daylights out of you’

Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

In February, Romeo received a letter from the Home Office, citing the 1971 Immigration Act. It said he had “NOT been given leave to enter the United Kingdom” and offered “support on returning home”, despite the fact he had moved to the UK from Antigua 59 years ago, aged four. The problem may have been caused by an administrative error on his birth certificate. After publicity, the Home Office said it was “urgently reviewing” his case. Romeo is still waiting.

Whitfield Francis, 58

‘I want to earn a living for me and my family’

Francis came from Jamaica with his two sisters when he was about seven, to join their parents. He worked on repairing Royal Navy ships but after being made redundant four years ago, no one will employ him because he does not have a passport or other proof of his right to live and work in the UK.

Valerie Baker, 66

‘I am British; that’s all I can be’

Photograph: Michael Powell for the Guardian

Baker arrived from Jamaica in 1955, aged four. She worked her whole adult life until chronic back problems forced early retirement. Last April, the Home Office told her she had no legal basis to remain in the UK and if she didn’t leave within seven days, she could be deported. Further letters told Baker her disability allowance had been stopped and she needed to return “overpayments” of £33,590. She eventually got British citizenship through her marriage.

Richard Stewart, 73

‘I think about this all the time’

Photograph: Jill Mead for the Guardian

Stewart was 10 when he moved from Jamaica to London in 1955 to live with his older sister, who was working as a nurse. In 1966 he was signed up to play cricket for Middlesex. He does not have a British passport and has been in immigration limbo for the past seven years, unable to afford the £1,400 fee for naturalisation in the UK.

Related Articles:

How The Guardian broke the Windrush Story – by Guardian Staff

Windrush: Home Office criticised after deportees not contacted

Source: BBC News Website 3 December 2018

Caroline Nokes, immigration minister, said deportees can ring the Windrush helpline or visit the government website GETTY Images

Campaigners have accused the Home Office of a lack of “decency” after it emerged dozens of people deported to Commonwealth countries have not been contacted by the Windrush task force.

Ministers said “no specific attempt” had been made to approach 49 people deported to Ghana and Nigeria in 2017.

The Home Office says it is up to Commonwealth citizens to seek information about their status.

MPs said it showed the government had learned nothing from the scandal.

The Windrush scandal was uncovered earlier this year, after many people from Commonwealth countries who had legally lived in Britain for decades were wrongly classed as illegal immigrants and deported.

They had been encouraged by the UK government to settle in Britain from the late 1940s until 1973.

However, although they had been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, some immigrants did not have formal paperwork confirming their residency status. 

It meant when the Home Office embarked on its so-called “hostile environment” policy designed to make staying in the UK more difficult, some Commonwealth immigrants were wrongly deported.

Their problems were compounded by a Home Office decision, in 2010, to destroy their landing cards – often the only record of their immigration status.

Following a public outcry, the government set up a task force to help people formalise their right to remain in the UK.

Thousands of people have now contacted the task force and received documents confirming their right to stay in Britain. 

However, following parliamentary questions from Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, Home Office ministers now admit there are 49 people who have still not been informed by the government that the task force exists.

The 49 were deported to Ghana and Nigeria between March and September 2017 – before the Windrush scandal erupted.

Satbir Singh, the chief executive of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: “If the Home Office has the capacity to deny somebody their rights, to separate them from their loved ones and remove them from the country, surely it has the capacity to find them, to apologise and to help them come home. 

“But this isn’t a question of capacity alone, it’s a question of decency, and yet another example of a department going out of its way to avoid doing the right thing. 

“As a country surely we can do so much better than this.”

Campaigner Zita Holbourne, who founded anti-austerity organisation Black Activists Rising Against Cuts and is the vice president of trade union PCS, called it “a disgrace”.

‘Reckless and incompetent’

Ms Lucas, who is MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: “It doesn’t seem much to ask for the government to tell people they’ve kicked out of the country that the Windrush task force exists.

“Ministers know their treatment of the Windrush generation is a national disgrace. That they haven’t bothered to contact people who’ve been deported suggests the government hasn’t learned anything from the public backlash against their hostile environment.”

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said this most recent case showed how “reckless and incompetent” the Home Office’s immigration policy was.

“People from almost every Commonwealth country have been treated badly under this Government’s hostile environment,” she said. “It’s clear these injustices will continue if ministers don’t even know what’s going on.”

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Ed Davey said anyone who may have been wrongly deported should be contacted and told how to apply to return and receive compensation. 

“In these cases, the Home Office seems to be waiting around for people to contact them – even though they may not have the means or information to do so. That’s an utter disgrace.”

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/embed/p06nlmfl/46421326

Home Office minister Ms Nokes, in her written ministerial answer to Ms Lucas’ question, said: “The Home Office has not made a specific attempt to inform those 49 people of the Windrush taskforce.

“The Home Office announcements relating to Commonwealth citizens can be found at www.gov.uk/windrush.

“This website is regularly updated with information about how individuals who believe they qualify under the Windrush criteria can apply for status under the Windrush Settlement Scheme.

“Assistance is also available through the Windrush Taskforce helpline on freephone 0800678 1925 or by email at commonwealthtaskforce@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “Any individual who believes they are protected under the provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act is able to contact the Windrush Taskforce, who will help to identify their current status.

“We have always been clear that the Windrush Scheme is not restricted to the Windrush generation or people from the Caribbean, but it is right that applicants for citizenship need to satisfy the good character and residence requirements.” 

presentational grey line

Were you deported to Ghana or Nigeria in 2017? Or do you know one of the 49? Get in touch by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. 

May, the enforcer, continues to blame Windrush victims for their fate

Source: The Guardian Website – Mon 1 Oct 2018 15.12 BST

Opinion: Nesrine Malik

The ‘hostile environment’ policy has been rebranded, but it is still finding excuses to destroy lives

“Interviewed by Andrew Marr on Sunday, May exhibited an almost sociopathic inability to even make the right noises.” Photograph: Jeff Overs/BBC/PA

Not all political scandals are bad. If a democratic system is robust, there are some political crises that present an opportunity to cleanse the system, like a good, sharp bout of food poisoning. Ministers resign, victims are compensated, processes and protocols are set up to ensure it does not happen again. For a brief moment when Sajid Javid took over the Home Office after Amber Rudd took the fall for Theresa May’s hostile environment miscarriages, it looked as though the Windrush scandal might be one of those political purge moments. Apologies were offered, hotlines were set up so that victims’ applications could be fast-tracked, and even legislation was affected, with measures to have NHS staff share patients’ data with the Home Office ditched.

But even with the intensity of public scrutiny and outrage, the horror of victims’ stories and the continued media focus on the excesses of the hostile environment, the government remains unwilling to go further. Interviewed by Andrew Marr on Sunday, May exhibited an almost sociopathic inability to even make the right noises. She refused to apologise for the hostile environment, opting instead to apologise that some were “caught up in that”. She retrenched, the time for humility was over, the hostile environment (which she now calls the “compliant environment”, as if a rebrand is all it will take to fix the Home Office) is “to ensure that those people who are here illegally are identified and appropriate action is taken”. And we are back to where we were when all those lost, suspended and shattered lives came to the world’s attention. The problem is not the cruel, expensive, impossible-to-navigate human rights violating immigration system, it is that it was not discerning enough. From now on, May is saying, we will make sure we only destroy the lives of the right people.

It is no surprise that Sajid Javid chose ‘good character’ as the terminus of the Windrush corrective train

And even that, if one’s belief is that those who are here illegally are fair game, is not true. The Windrush generation is still caught up in the hostile, sorry, compliant environment. Last week, it was revealed that some were still being denied British passports, despite having inalienable citizenship rights. Javid stated that some failed a “necessary good character requirement” because they had committed criminal offences. This is something that anyone born in the UK will never have to go through. Windrush citizens are supposed to be afforded the same rights as British citizens, so holding them to this standard effectively, and without a flicker of shame, affords them second-class status. It is no surprise that Javid chose “good character” as the terminus of the Windrush corrective train, even though that violates Windrush generation citizenship rights. It is for the same reason May will not apologise and invokes illegal immigration in the same breath as her non-apology – shifting blame on to the victims.

This drains the well of sympathy. By twinning illegal immigration and bad character with the Windrush scandal in the public mind, it becomes easier to argue the government was just doing its job to protect citizens from fence jumpers and ex-cons. It becomes easier to divert attention away from the actual policies, some of which have led to millions of taxpayer pounds being paid in compensation for human rights violations in illegal detention.

The problem is not that the hostile environment only works by pushing as many people as possible into illegal status so that they can be deported. The problem is not austerity, which has meant Home Office staff are untrained, underresourced and motivated to reject. The problem is not a party that has decided it will play cheap politics by fostering and pandering to xenophobia. And the problem is definitely not a prime minister who has only one clear success in her political career of which it appears she is proud – implementing an immigration policy that she was tasked with when she ran the Home Office. May is an enforcer, it is her one speed as a politician. Is it any wonder, with the way her premiership is going, that she will not apologise?

The virus is too deeply ingrained. Despite the purge, the system was not cleansed. The virus mutated, settling in more deeply among the ranks of government under a prime minister who still cannot see any fault with her immigration system, and a Home Office minister who has managed with impressive speed to strike the right Tory tone, stripping people of their rights and then blaming them for it.

• Nesrine Malik is a Guardian columnist

As A Windrush Victim, No Amount Of Compensation Can Make Up For 35 Years Of Lost Time

I never thought that I was anything other than British. How do you compensate me for missed opportunities with my kids? Or not being there for my dying mother?

Source: The Huffington Post Website 15/10/2018 09:24 BST | Updated 15/10/2018 17:45 BST Richard Black
PA Wire/PA Images

Arriving in London as a child in the 1960s, I was totally surprised by the size of the homes and how cold it was. It was strange to see people that were different in colour than what I had been accustomed to, but then I stopped giving it much thought.

When I was finally enrolled in school it was the happiest day my life. It was an opportunity to make new friends. At that time, the school had a large immigrant population, so I did not feel left out and the teachers were very friendly and made us feel welcome.

For my mum it was a different story, she was afraid of going out even to work because of the constant abuse that she suffered at the time. My mother was white-passing mixed-race, so she would be constantly looked at. She suffered verbal abuse from white people and then there were the physical attacks on people of colour, so it meant that she would no longer go out to the shops.

I would eat the scraps that she brought home from the kitchens that she serviced and we would wait until my brother would come home for us to go and buy food.

I can’t remember ever being scared although I did encounter bullying. But I had a different approach, I tackled it head on. I was not going to allow anyone to inject fear into me, and I was well-liked at school with a lot of friends who would stick up for me.

My school experiences were mixed, but mainly positive, on the other hand it tore me apart to see and hear my mother speak about what she had to face almost on a daily basis.

Living in West London in the 1960s was a mixture of different cultures, you had west Indians and the African diaspora as well, it was an extremely cosmopolitan mix.

I did not suffer from racism until I was in my teens, being called a n***** or a co** was met in my usual style of returning the compliment. I soon realised the best thing for me to do was not to try and mix but to stay with other people of colour. We would let our hair down at house parties – where I met the mother of two of my British-born children.

I never thought that I was anything other than British, yes different in colour but still British. No matter how many insults we suffered or people telling us to go back home, we still thought that we had a right to be in the UK.

I never could have imagined that decades later we could be treated in this way.

For the last 35 years, since an extended holiday to Trinidad, I’ve been locked out of the UK. My mother fell ill in 2003, and died later that year. Countless trips to the British Embassy and pleading with staff to allow me to return fell on deaf ears. Not being by her side during her illness and her subsequent passing has left me with a sense of guilt that no matter how hard I try it will not go away.

No amount of compensation can bring those moments back for me. How do you start to compensate someone for 35 years of lost opportunities?

Not being able to give comfort or to be there for my dying mother. How do you compensate me for missed opportunities with my kids, not being able to see them grow up. How much compensation will the state pay to eradicate the sense of abandonment that my kids have felt over the years?

I never thought that after arriving in the UK as a child that I would have to go through telephone interviews to see whether I still have strong ties to the UK.

I never thought that I would be fighting to retain my rights as a citizen of the UK. It feels to me like domestic abuse in its worst form – the Home Office trying to disenfranchise a whole group of people who have a legal right to be in the UK without any due process.

In my years in the UK, I cannot remember ever having spoken to a police officer, far less being charged for any form of criminality, I have never been arrested or held.

The UK’s rejection of us feels like we’ve been used and kicked to the curb.

Since being recognised as a victim of the Windrush scandal, my hopes have turned to despair. The mess was supposed to take two weeks to be resolved, yet here we are more than five months later. I feel totally betrayed.

The government has failed miserably to address the concerns of the victims in any meaningful way, some of us are still living in a state of total destitution with no access to housing, healthcare or jobs. My situation, although not as severe as others, still has left me feeling that I am a third-class citizen in a country that I grew up in and called home.

You cannot put a price on the suffering or hopelessness that I have endured over the years. On many occasions when you call the Windrush helpline you are met with civil servants who are not sympathetic, who cannot begin to understand the plight of the people they are supposed to be helping. I see no end to my suffering as a Windrush victim, I guess in that I am not alone, one can only pray that before the deaths of the Windrush generation something positive will happen and finally we will get justice.

Related article:

Windrush scandal ‘robbed me of my family and friends’ and should cost the PM her job

Source: Sky News Webpage 16:05, UK, Wednesday 25 April 2018

Leo Marius, now known as Richard Black, says he has not been able to return to the UK

Leo Marius moved from St Lucia to start a new life in London in 1960. But after his British passport expired while visiting his in-laws in Trinidad in 1983, he has not been allowed to return to the UK.

His marriage broke down, he lost contact with his two London-born daughters and he was unable to attend his mother’s funeral.

Now known as Richard Black, the 64-year-old tells Sky News’s Sandy Rashty about the Government’s treatment of the “Windrush generation”.

When I realised my passport had expired, I went to the High Commission for some clarity.

They told me the passport could not be renewed and they tried to bully me to get a St Lucian or a Trinidad and Tobago passport.

But I have never applied for another passport. I should not have to do that.

I am stranded, I am stateless. I have not seen my two daughters since I came to Trinidad.

They think I abandoned them. They were only six and two years old when I left.

I think about what I could have had with my children, about my friends and my memories.

West Indian residents arrived in Britain after the Second World War

I think about my mother, about not being there for her when she was going through her period of illness and not being able to attend her funeral. How would you feel?

I have been robbed of family, friends, proper healthcare, proper everything.

I want to come back to England. My mother is buried there and I want to come and visit her grave.

I have always felt that I was a British citizen. In the 33 years that I have been in Trinidad, I have not travelled outside the shores of Trinidad.

I feel that 33 years of my life here in Trinidad, to be honest, has not been bad. But I have been robbed of family, friends, proper healthcare. Everything I enjoyed from a child aged six.

I went to school in London. I grew up in Notting Hill.

I am saddened by what has happened to me.

I always thought I was alone in this. To understand now that a lot of people have been impacted by racist laws. I am heartbroken for West Indians. Don’t we matter? Aren’t we people too?

Why are we being singled out?

We came when England, after the World War, was on its knees.

We took all the jobs that white people did not want to take: nursing, looking after the sick, working on the buses, on the underground, conductors, bus drivers.

And now, we are no longer required. We are no longer needed, wanted, so we are just thrown out with the garbage.

I find that Theresa May and (Amber) Rudd – should do the best thing now. Leave. Resign. Stop this nonsense.

They are impugning the good character of hard working people who went to England to assist, to try and build back the country, to do what other citizens did not want to do.

And to be treated like animals and dogs?

It is obscene. There is a special place in hell for people like that.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “As the Home Secretary announced, members of the Windrush generation who arrived in the UK before 1973 and have stayed to build a life here will be eligible for free citizenship.

“The offer, which will be available to people from Commonwealth countries, not just Caribbean nationals, will extend to individuals who have no current documentation, those who already have leave to remain and want to advance their status and children of the Windrush generation.”